[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231107100905.GA27932@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 12:09:05 +0200
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jack Zhu <jack.zhu@...rfivetech.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>, bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
changhuang.liang@...rfivetech.com,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/9] Add StarFive Camera Subsystem driver
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 09:27:34AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 04:05:11PM +0800, Jack Zhu wrote:
> > > Also, while you wait, why not just finish off the last 3 items on the
> > > TODO list which would make your code not be required to go into the
> > > staging portion of the tree at all? You've had a few weeks now, what is
> > > preventing that from happening, and when will that work actually be
> > > done?
> >
> > One of my colleagues is doing related development, but he also has other
> > projects at the same time, so he cannot devote all his efforts to this
> > development. And we expect to use libcamera, which may take some time.
>
> So that means there is no real plan at all to get this out of the
> staging directory? If so, why should we take it at all as obviously
> this means that the code is now abandoned?
"Taking some time" doesn't necessarily mean "abandoned". I agree that
more often that not we've seen code dumped in staging and left there
unmaintained. Once bitten, twice shy (or as we say in French, a scalded
cat fears cold water), but let's not necessarily assume the worst
possible outcome :-)
Of course, if StarFive wants to speed up development of the ISP support,
both on the kernel side and libcamera side, I'm sure Kieran and I can
help (possibly not very fast if it is only done in our spare time
though, but that's a separate discussion).
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists