linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 01/31] wifi: plfxlc: fix clang-specific fortify warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231107120704.3756327-1-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue,  7 Nov 2023 07:05:48 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@...dex.ru>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        srini.raju@...elifi.com, nathan@...nel.org,
        ndesaulniers@...gle.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 01/31] wifi: plfxlc: fix clang-specific fortify warning

From: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@...dex.ru>

[ Upstream commit a763e92c78615ea838f5b9a841398b1d4adb968e ]

When compiling with clang 16.0.6 and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, I've
noticed the following (somewhat confusing due to absence of an actual
source code location):

In file included from drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/plfxlc/mac.c:6:
In file included from ./include/linux/netdevice.h:24:
In file included from ./include/linux/timer.h:6:
In file included from ./include/linux/ktime.h:24:
In file included from ./include/linux/time.h:60:
In file included from ./include/linux/time32.h:13:
In file included from ./include/linux/timex.h:67:
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/timex.h:5:
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:23:
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h:11:
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpumask.h:5:
In file included from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:12:
In file included from ./include/linux/bitmap.h:11:
In file included from ./include/linux/string.h:254:
./include/linux/fortify-string.h:592:4: warning: call to '__read_overflow2_field'
declared with 'warning' attribute: detected read beyond size of field (2nd
parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning]
                        __read_overflow2_field(q_size_field, size);

The compiler actually complains on 'plfxlc_get_et_strings()' where
fortification logic inteprets call to 'memcpy()' as an attempt to copy
the whole 'et_strings' array from its first member and so issues an
overread warning. This warning may be silenced by passing an address
of the whole array and not the first member to 'memcpy()'.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@...dex.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230829094541.234751-1-dmantipov@yandex.ru
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/plfxlc/mac.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/plfxlc/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/plfxlc/mac.c
index 94ee831b5de35..506d2f31efb5a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/plfxlc/mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/plfxlc/mac.c
@@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ static void plfxlc_get_et_strings(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 				  u32 sset, u8 *data)
 {
 	if (sset == ETH_SS_STATS)
-		memcpy(data, *et_strings, sizeof(et_strings));
+		memcpy(data, et_strings, sizeof(et_strings));
 }
 
 static void plfxlc_get_et_stats(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
-- 
2.42.0