[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231107025838.2806500-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 10:58:38 +0800
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
To: <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>, <zhaowenhui8@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix CPU lowest Frequency bug when offline/online for passive
There is a bug in passive mode for intel pstate when
CONFIG_X86_INTEL_PSTATE = y and configure intel_pstate = passive in command
line. On Ice Lake server, although the performance tuner is used, the CPU
have the lowest frequency in scaling_cur_freq after the CPU goes offline and
then goes online, running the same infinite loop load.
How to reproduce:
cat while_true.c
#include <stdio.h>
void main(void)
{
while(1);
}
[root@...alhost freq_test]# cat test.sh
#!/bin/bash
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/cpufreq/scaling_governor
taskset -c ${1} ./while_true &
sleep 1s
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq
echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/online
sleep 1s
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq
sleep 1s
echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/online
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq
taskset -c ${1} ./while_true &
sleep 1s
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq
sleep 1s
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq
sleep 1s
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq
The CPU frequency is adjusted to the minimum after offline and online:
[root@...alhost freq_test]# sh test.sh 20
2300000
performance
2299977
cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu20/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq: Device or
resource busy
800000
800000
800000
799992
[root@...alhost freq_test]# sh test.sh 21
2300000
performance
2300000
cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu21/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq: Device or
resource busy
800000
800000
800000
800000
As in __cpufreq_driver_target(), the cpufreq core will not call intel
cpufreq's target() callback if the target freq is equal with policy->cur
and do not set CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS flag, but the hardware also not
proactively keep CPU with the policy->cur frequency. So also set
CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS for passive mode. After applying this patch,
the CPU frequency is consistent as what performance tuner expected after
CPU offline and online as below:
[root@...alhost freq_test]# sh test.sh 20
2300000
performance
2300000
cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu20/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq: Device or resource busy
2300000
2300000
2299977
2299977
[root@...alhost freq_test]# sh test.sh 21
2300000
performance
2300000
cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu21/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq: Device or resource busy
2300000
2300000
2300000
2300000
[root@...alhost freq_test]# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/status
passive
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index a534a1f7f1ee..73403f1292b0 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -3091,7 +3091,7 @@ static int intel_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
}
static struct cpufreq_driver intel_cpufreq = {
- .flags = CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS,
+ .flags = CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS | CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS,
.verify = intel_cpufreq_verify_policy,
.target = intel_cpufreq_target,
.fast_switch = intel_cpufreq_fast_switch,
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists