[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231107084844.7a39ac3f@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 08:48:44 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 24/32] x86/ftrace: Enable HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FREGS
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 14:43:28 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > It's only needed if an architecture supports direct trampolines.
>
> I see, and x86_64 needs it.
> OK, maybe better to keep it clear on x86-64 even on the
> return handler.
As it is arch specific, I'm not sure it matters for the return handler, as
the return should never call a direct trampoline.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists