[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB6083C78697406D9B7AA35EC0FCA8A@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 20:10:08 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
CC: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"patches@...ts.linux.dev" <patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v10 4/8] x86/resctrl: Split the rdt_domain and
rdt_hw_domain structures
> struct rdt_ctrl_domain {
> struct rdt_domain_hdr hdr;
> struct cpumask cpu_mask;
> ...
> }
>
> Considering the description of the changes to expect in this version I
> did not expect to see a cpu_mask member in struct rdt_ctrl_domain since
> it has now been moved to struct rdt_domain_hdr. What am I missing?
Reinette,
Yes. cpu_mask was moved into "struct rdt_domain_hdr" in patch 2 of the
series. I'm not sure how it managed to reappear here. Definitely a zombie.
I've removed it now.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists