lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54d1437e-dcbb-49c6-a83c-bc87da03f196@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Nov 2023 15:41:25 -0500
From:   "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@...cent.com>,
        Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@...gle.com>,
        Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/19] KVM: x86/pmu: Allow programming events that
 match unsupported arch events



On 2023-11-07 7:31 p.m., Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Remove KVM's bogus restriction that the guest can't program an event whose
> encoding matches an unsupported architectural event.  The enumeration of
> an architectural event only says that if a CPU supports an architectural
> event, then the event can be programmed using the architectural encoding.
> The enumeration does NOT say anything about the encoding when the CPU
> doesn't report support the architectural event.
> 
> Preventing the guest from counting events whose encoding happens to match
> an architectural event breaks existing functionality whenever Intel adds
> an architectural encoding that was *ever* used for a CPU that doesn't
> enumerate support for the architectural event, even if the encoding is for
> the exact same event!
> 
> E.g. the architectural encoding for Top-Down Slots is 0x01a4.  Broadwell
> CPUs, which do not support the Top-Down Slots architectural event, 0x10a4
> is a valid, model-specific event.  Denying guest usage of 0x01a4 if/when
> KVM adds support for Top-Down slots would break any Broadwell-based guest.
> 
> Reported-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2004baa6-b494-462c-a11f-8104ea152c6a@linux.intel.com
> Fixes: a21864486f7e ("KVM: x86/pmu: Fix available_event_types check for REF_CPU_CYCLES event")
> Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---


Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>

Thanks,
Kan

>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-pmu-ops.h |  1 -
>  arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c                     |  1 -
>  arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h                     |  1 -
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c                 |  6 ----
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c           | 38 --------------------------
>  5 files changed, 47 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-pmu-ops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-pmu-ops.h
> index 6c98f4bb4228..884af8ef7657 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-pmu-ops.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-pmu-ops.h
> @@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ BUILD_BUG_ON(1)
>   * a NULL definition, for example if "static_call_cond()" will be used
>   * at the call sites.
>   */
> -KVM_X86_PMU_OP(hw_event_available)
>  KVM_X86_PMU_OP(pmc_idx_to_pmc)
>  KVM_X86_PMU_OP(rdpmc_ecx_to_pmc)
>  KVM_X86_PMU_OP(msr_idx_to_pmc)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> index 9ae07db6f0f6..99ed72966528 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> @@ -374,7 +374,6 @@ static bool check_pmu_event_filter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
>  static bool pmc_event_is_allowed(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
>  {
>  	return pmc_is_globally_enabled(pmc) && pmc_speculative_in_use(pmc) &&
> -	       static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_hw_event_available)(pmc) &&
>  	       check_pmu_event_filter(pmc);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
> index 1d64113de488..10fe5bf02705 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
>  #define VMWARE_BACKDOOR_PMC_APPARENT_TIME	0x10002
>  
>  struct kvm_pmu_ops {
> -	bool (*hw_event_available)(struct kvm_pmc *pmc);
>  	struct kvm_pmc *(*pmc_idx_to_pmc)(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, int pmc_idx);
>  	struct kvm_pmc *(*rdpmc_ecx_to_pmc)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  		unsigned int idx, u64 *mask);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
> index 373ff6a6687b..5596fe816ea8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
> @@ -73,11 +73,6 @@ static inline struct kvm_pmc *get_gp_pmc_amd(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, u32 msr,
>  	return amd_pmc_idx_to_pmc(pmu, idx);
>  }
>  
> -static bool amd_hw_event_available(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> -{
> -	return true;
> -}
> -
>  static bool amd_is_valid_rdpmc_ecx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int idx)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> @@ -249,7 +244,6 @@ static void amd_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  }
>  
>  struct kvm_pmu_ops amd_pmu_ops __initdata = {
> -	.hw_event_available = amd_hw_event_available,
>  	.pmc_idx_to_pmc = amd_pmc_idx_to_pmc,
>  	.rdpmc_ecx_to_pmc = amd_rdpmc_ecx_to_pmc,
>  	.msr_idx_to_pmc = amd_msr_idx_to_pmc,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> index c6e227edcf8e..7737ee2fc62f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> @@ -101,43 +101,6 @@ static struct kvm_pmc *intel_pmc_idx_to_pmc(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, int pmc_idx)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static bool intel_hw_event_available(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> -{
> -	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = pmc_to_pmu(pmc);
> -	u8 event_select = pmc->eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT;
> -	u8 unit_mask = (pmc->eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK) >> 8;
> -	int i;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Fixed counters are always available if KVM reaches this point.  If a
> -	 * fixed counter is unsupported in hardware or guest CPUID, KVM doesn't
> -	 * allow the counter's corresponding MSR to be written.  KVM does use
> -	 * architectural events to program fixed counters, as the interface to
> -	 * perf doesn't allow requesting a specific fixed counter, e.g. perf
> -	 * may (sadly) back a guest fixed PMC with a general purposed counter.
> -	 * But if _hardware_ doesn't support the associated event, KVM simply
> -	 * doesn't enumerate support for the fixed counter.
> -	 */
> -	if (pmc_is_fixed(pmc))
> -		return true;
> -
> -	BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(intel_arch_events) != NR_INTEL_ARCH_EVENTS);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Disallow events reported as unavailable in guest CPUID.  Note, this
> -	 * doesn't apply to pseudo-architectural events (see above).
> -	 */
> -	for (i = 0; i < NR_REAL_INTEL_ARCH_EVENTS; i++) {
> -		if (intel_arch_events[i].eventsel != event_select ||
> -		    intel_arch_events[i].unit_mask != unit_mask)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		return pmu->available_event_types & BIT(i);
> -	}
> -
> -	return true;
> -}
> -
>  static bool intel_is_valid_rdpmc_ecx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int idx)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> @@ -802,7 +765,6 @@ void intel_pmu_cross_mapped_check(struct kvm_pmu *pmu)
>  }
>  
>  struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops __initdata = {
> -	.hw_event_available = intel_hw_event_available,
>  	.pmc_idx_to_pmc = intel_pmc_idx_to_pmc,
>  	.rdpmc_ecx_to_pmc = intel_rdpmc_ecx_to_pmc,
>  	.msr_idx_to_pmc = intel_msr_idx_to_pmc,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ