lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:00:45 -0500
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] lsm: fix default return values for some hooks

On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 4:30 AM Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 4:12 AM Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 8:32 AM Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Some of the default return values listed in <linux/lsm_hook_defs.h>
> > > don't match the actual no-op value and can be trivially fixed.
> > >
> > > Ondrej Mosnacek (2):
> > >   lsm: fix default return value for vm_enough_memory
> > >   lsm: fix default return value for inode_getsecctx
> > >
> > >  include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 4 ++--
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > These both look like reasonable -stable candidates to me, what do you think?
>
> Yes, that would be my assessment as well.

Okay, good.  I've just gone ahead and merged these into lsm/stable-6.7
and I'll plan to send them up to Linus on Thursday or Friday this
week.  Thanks.

-- 
paul-moore.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ