lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhRo2GzW0jSqmm0Sv3z_-q9PTsvScV5oQwF5uNh+ZcWreA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Nov 2023 22:12:24 -0500
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] lsm: fix default return values for some hooks

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 8:32 AM Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Some of the default return values listed in <linux/lsm_hook_defs.h>
> don't match the actual no-op value and can be trivially fixed.
>
> Ondrej Mosnacek (2):
>   lsm: fix default return value for vm_enough_memory
>   lsm: fix default return value for inode_getsecctx
>
>  include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

These both look like reasonable -stable candidates to me, what do you think?

-- 
paul-moore.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ