[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231108-zwerge-unheil-b3f48a84038d@brauner>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 08:58:32 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-man@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>, Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
Matthew House <mattlloydhouse@...il.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] add statmount(2) syscall
> > +static int do_statmount(struct stmt_state *s)
> > +{
> > + struct statmnt *sm = &s->sm;
> > + struct mount *m = real_mount(s->mnt);
> > + size_t copysize = min_t(size_t, s->bufsize, sizeof(*sm));
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + err = security_sb_statfs(s->mnt->mnt_root);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) &&
> > + !is_path_reachable(m, m->mnt.mnt_root, &s->root))
> > + return -EPERM;
>
> In order to be consistent with our typical access control ordering,
> please move the security_sb_statfs() call down to here, after the
> capability checks.
I've moved the security_sb_statfs() calls accordingly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists