linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Limit HS-G5 Rate-A to hosts with HW version 5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <59f83fcd-6c2d-6b8a-55e6-0db07bfb5744@quicinc.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:42:42 +0800
From:   Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Can Guo <cang@....qualcomm.com>
CC:     <bvanassche@....org>, <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        <avri.altman@....com>, <junwoo80.lee@...sung.com>,
        <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Limit HS-G5 Rate-A to hosts
 with HW version 5

Hi Mani,

On 11/8/2023 1:25 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 08:46:10PM -0800, Can Guo wrote:
>> From: Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>
>>
>> Qcom UFS hosts, with HW ver 5, can only support up to HS-G5 Rate-A due to
>> HW limitations. If the HS-G5 PHY gear is used, update host_params->hs_rate
>> to Rate-A, so that the subsequent power mode changes shall stick to Rate-A.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
>> index 60b35ca..55ee31d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
>> @@ -442,9 +442,25 @@ static u32 ufs_qcom_get_hs_gear(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>>   static int ufs_qcom_power_up_sequence(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>>   {
>>   	struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
>> +	struct ufs_host_params *host_params = &host->host_params;
>>   	struct phy *phy = host->generic_phy;
>> +	enum phy_mode mode;
>>   	int ret;
>>   
>> +	/*
>> +	 * HW ver 5 can only support up to HS-G5 Rate-A due to HW limitations.
> 
> Does this limitation apply to future targets as well or just to SM8550? If
> it's the latter, then we need to use a flag.
> 
> - ManiUFS host controller HW ver (major) 5 IPs (they may have different 
minor/step verions) can be used by many QCOM chipsets, so it applies to 
several available targets and future targets which are going to have HW 
ver 5 UFS host controller. This limitation goes away since HW ver 6.

Thanks,
Can Guo.