[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231108090333.GI8262@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:03:33 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
luto@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, willy@...radead.org, mgorman@...e.de,
jon.grimm@....com, bharata@....com, raghavendra.kt@....com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
jgross@...e.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, mingo@...nel.org,
bristot@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de,
anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com, mattst88@...il.com,
krypton@...ich-teichert.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
David.Laight@...lab.com, richard@....at, mjguzik@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 38/86] sched: *_tsk_need_resched() now takes resched_t
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 01:57:24PM -0800, Ankur Arora wrote:
> *_tsk_need_resched() need to test for the specific need-resched
> flag.
>
> The only users are RCU and the scheduler. For RCU we always want
> to schedule at the earliest opportunity and that is always
> RESCHED_eager.
Why ?
>
> For the scheduler, keep everything as RESCHED_eager for now.
Why ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists