[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231108094055.221234-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 04:40:55 -0500
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] selftests: kvm/s390x: use vm_create_barebones()
This function does the same but makes it clearer why one would use
the "____"-prefixed version of vm_create().
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/cmma_test.c | 11 +++--------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/cmma_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/cmma_test.c
index c8e0a6495a63..626a2b8a2037 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/cmma_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/cmma_test.c
@@ -94,11 +94,6 @@ static void guest_dirty_test_data(void)
);
}
-static struct kvm_vm *create_vm(void)
-{
- return ____vm_create(VM_MODE_DEFAULT);
-}
-
static void create_main_memslot(struct kvm_vm *vm)
{
int i;
@@ -157,7 +152,7 @@ static struct kvm_vm *create_vm_two_memslots(void)
{
struct kvm_vm *vm;
- vm = create_vm();
+ vm = vm_create_barebones();
create_memslots(vm);
@@ -276,7 +271,7 @@ static void assert_exit_was_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static void test_migration_mode(void)
{
- struct kvm_vm *vm = create_vm();
+ struct kvm_vm *vm = vm_create_barebones();
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
u64 orig_psw;
int rc;
@@ -670,7 +665,7 @@ struct testdef {
*/
static int machine_has_cmma(void)
{
- struct kvm_vm *vm = create_vm();
+ struct kvm_vm *vm = vm_create_barebones();
int r;
r = !__kvm_has_device_attr(vm->fd, KVM_S390_VM_MEM_CTRL, KVM_S390_VM_MEM_ENABLE_CMMA);
--
2.39.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists