linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/86] Make the kernel preemptible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d2ac7d2a-95cd-4da0-ac00-985cbbab9f08@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:53:27 +0100
From:   Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        luto@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, willy@...radead.org, mgorman@...e.de,
        jon.grimm@....com, bharata@....com, raghavendra.kt@....com,
        boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
        jgross@...e.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, mingo@...nel.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
        glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de, anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com,
        mattst88@...il.com, krypton@...ich-teichert.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, David.Laight@...lab.com, richard@....at,
        mjguzik@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/86] Make the kernel preemptible

On 11/8/23 09:51, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 01:56:46PM -0800, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have two models of preemption: voluntary and full 
> 3, also none (RT is not actually a preemption model).
> 
>> (and RT which is
>> a fuller form of full preemption.)
> It is not in fact a different preemption model, it is the same full
> preemption, the difference with RT is that it makes a lot more stuff
> preemptible, but the fundamental preemption model is the same -- full.

+1

-- Daniel