linux-kernel - [PATCH -next] md: synchronize flush io with array reconfiguration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231108180210.3657203-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Date:   Thu,  9 Nov 2023 02:02:10 +0800
From:   Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To:     xni@...hat.com, song@...nel.org, maan@...temlinux.org,
        neilb@...e.de
Cc:     linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yukuai3@...wei.com, yukuai1@...weicloud.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
        yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: [PATCH -next] md: synchronize flush io with array reconfiguration

From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>

Currently rcu is used to protect iterating rdev from submit_flushes():

submit_flushes			remove_and_add_spares
				 synchronize_rcu
				 pers->hot_remove_disk()
 rcu_read_lock()
 rdev_for_each_rcu
  if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0)
				 rdev->radi_disk = -1;
   atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending)
   rcu_read_unlock()
   bi = bio_alloc_bioset()
   bi->bi_end_io = md_end_flush
   bi->private = rdev
   submit_bio
   // issue io for removed rdev

Fix this problem by grabbing 'acive_io' before iterating rdev, make sure
that remove_and_add_spares() won't concurrent with submit_flushes().

Fixes: a2826aa92e2e ("md: support barrier requests on all personalities.")
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/md/md.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 4ee4593c874a..eb3e455bcbae 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -529,6 +529,9 @@ static void md_end_flush(struct bio *bio)
 	rdev_dec_pending(rdev, mddev);
 
 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mddev->flush_pending)) {
+		/* The pair is percpu_ref_tryget() from md_flush_request() */
+		percpu_ref_put(&mddev->active_io);
+
 		/* The pre-request flush has finished */
 		queue_work(md_wq, &mddev->flush_work);
 	}
@@ -548,12 +551,8 @@ static void submit_flushes(struct work_struct *ws)
 	rdev_for_each_rcu(rdev, mddev)
 		if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&
 		    !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags)) {
-			/* Take two references, one is dropped
-			 * when request finishes, one after
-			 * we reclaim rcu_read_lock
-			 */
 			struct bio *bi;
-			atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending);
+
 			atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending);
 			rcu_read_unlock();
 			bi = bio_alloc_bioset(rdev->bdev, 0,
@@ -564,7 +563,6 @@ static void submit_flushes(struct work_struct *ws)
 			atomic_inc(&mddev->flush_pending);
 			submit_bio(bi);
 			rcu_read_lock();
-			rdev_dec_pending(rdev, mddev);
 		}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mddev->flush_pending))
@@ -617,6 +615,17 @@ bool md_flush_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio)
 	/* new request after previous flush is completed */
 	if (ktime_after(req_start, mddev->prev_flush_start)) {
 		WARN_ON(mddev->flush_bio);
+		/*
+		 * Grab a reference to make sure mddev_suspend() will wait for
+		 * this flush to be done.
+		 *
+		 * md_flush_reqeust() is called under md_handle_request() and
+		 * 'active_io' is already grabbed, hence percpu_ref_tryget()
+		 * won't fail, percpu_ref_tryget_live() can't be used because
+		 * percpu_ref_kill() can be called by mddev_suspend()
+		 * concurrently.
+		 */
+		percpu_ref_tryget(&mddev->active_io);
 		mddev->flush_bio = bio;
 		bio = NULL;
 	}
-- 
2.39.2