[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231108112005.54e86585@p-imbrenda>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 11:20:05 +0100
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: kvm/s390x: use vm_create_barebones()
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 04:40:55 -0500
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
> This function does the same but makes it clearer why one would use
> the "____"-prefixed version of vm_create().
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/cmma_test.c | 11 +++--------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/cmma_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/cmma_test.c
> index c8e0a6495a63..626a2b8a2037 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/cmma_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/cmma_test.c
> @@ -94,11 +94,6 @@ static void guest_dirty_test_data(void)
> );
> }
>
> -static struct kvm_vm *create_vm(void)
> -{
> - return ____vm_create(VM_MODE_DEFAULT);
> -}
> -
> static void create_main_memslot(struct kvm_vm *vm)
> {
> int i;
> @@ -157,7 +152,7 @@ static struct kvm_vm *create_vm_two_memslots(void)
> {
> struct kvm_vm *vm;
>
> - vm = create_vm();
> + vm = vm_create_barebones();
>
> create_memslots(vm);
>
> @@ -276,7 +271,7 @@ static void assert_exit_was_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> static void test_migration_mode(void)
> {
> - struct kvm_vm *vm = create_vm();
> + struct kvm_vm *vm = vm_create_barebones();
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> u64 orig_psw;
> int rc;
> @@ -670,7 +665,7 @@ struct testdef {
> */
> static int machine_has_cmma(void)
> {
> - struct kvm_vm *vm = create_vm();
> + struct kvm_vm *vm = vm_create_barebones();
> int r;
>
> r = !__kvm_has_device_attr(vm->fd, KVM_S390_VM_MEM_CTRL, KVM_S390_VM_MEM_ENABLE_CMMA);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists