linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] gfs2 fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiN4e_C+tONr6p+f51ae8QoXB8tvoN8zQFdyiRi1DzO1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Nov 2023 16:04:19 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Andreas Grünbacher <andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com>
Cc:     Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>, gfs2@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] gfs2 fixes

On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 14:18, Andreas Grünbacher
<andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I apologize for referring to the entire set of commits as fixes when
> it's really fixes and various other things. I've said so in the tag
> description, but I realize now that that's not good enough. Lying
> about what those commits are wasn't my intention though.

.. and hey, sorry about my outburst.

Your pull request was the first one this merge window where I reacted
to how many of the commits weren't in my copy of the linux-next tree,
and there wasn't any reason why in the description. So I reacted very
strongly.

It didn't help that I had a headache. Rather than look at how many
other of the pending pull requests I have that ended up coming in in
the last 24 hours have the same issue, I decided to lie down in a dark
room for a few hours.

                  Linus