[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOssrKeUbmEUWnT_JoRRAb0asttB3FfMva121D+sXFYEuFTV8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 13:18:46 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
To: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
Cc: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Lawrence <paullawrence@...gle.com>,
Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@...gle.com>,
Alessio Balsini <balsini@...roid.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
Bernd Schubert <bschubert@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Revert "fuse: Apply flags2 only when userspace set the FUSE_INIT_EXT"
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 11:31 AM André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org> wrote:
> We are using the Android kernel in all cases and Android applies
> patches on top of Linus' tree, yes (as does everybody else). The
> previous Android kernel worked, the current Android kernel doesn't
> because of the patch in question.
Why don't you revert the patch in question in the Android kernel?
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists