[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6da49b39-653a-1eda-2d21-1f1b50cb14f0@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 09:04:48 -0500
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@...pee.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
boqun.feng@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Remove unnessary check in
rwsem_down_read_slowpath()
On 11/8/23 05:56, Haifeng Xu wrote:
> When the owner of rw_semaphore is reader, the count can't be
> RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED, so there is no need to check it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@...pee.com>
> ---
> kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> index 2340b6d90ec6..7a4d8a9ebd9c 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> @@ -1005,8 +1005,7 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long count, unsigned int stat
> * waiter, don't attempt optimistic lock stealing if the lock is
> * currently owned by readers.
> */
> - if ((atomic_long_read(&sem->owner) & RWSEM_READER_OWNED) &&
> - (rcnt > 1) && !(count & RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED))
> + if ((atomic_long_read(&sem->owner) & RWSEM_READER_OWNED) && (rcnt > 1))
> goto queue;
>
> /*
Unlike RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED bit in count, the RWSEM_READER_OWNED bit in
owner is just a hint, not an authoritative state of the rwsem. So it is
possible that both the RWSEM_READER_OWNED bit can be set in owner and
RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED bit set in count in a transition period right after
RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED bit is set. So the RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED check can
still provide some value. We should probably update the comment to
reflect that.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists