[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231108141828.GA1574@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 15:18:28 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Petr Tesařík <petr@...arici.cz>
Cc: Petr Tesarik <petrtesarik@...weicloud.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik.ext@...wei.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wangkefeng <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>,
Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik1@...wei-partners.com>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] swiotlb: fix out-of-bounds TLB allocations with
CONFIG_SWIOTLB_DYNAMIC
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 01:21:20PM +0100, Petr Tesařík wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:12:49 +0100
> Petr Tesarik <petrtesarik@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik1@...wei-partners.com>
> >
> > Limit the free list length to the size of the IO TLB. Transient pool can be
> > smaller than IO_TLB_SEGSIZE, but the free list is initialized with the
> > assumption that the total number of slots is a multiple of IO_TLB_SEGSIZE.
> > As a result, swiotlb_area_find_slots() may allocate slots past the end of
> > a transient IO TLB buffer.
>
> Just to make it clear, this patch addresses only the memory corruption
> reported by Niklas, without addressing the underlying issues. Where
> corruption happened before, allocations will fail with this patch.
Thanks, I've applied so that we can get it into -rc1.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists