linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] mtd: rawnand: gpio: Rename file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231108165905.4675430e@xps-13>
Date:   Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:59:05 +0100
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
        Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] mtd: rawnand: gpio: Rename file

Hi Linus,

linus.walleij@...aro.org wrote on Wed, 08 Nov 2023 15:33:54 +0100:

> The implementation of the GPIO NAND controller is just "gpio"
> with the usecase for NAND implied from the folder nand/raw.
> 
> This is not so great when the module gets the name "gpio.ko".
> Rename the implementation to nand-gpio.c so the module is
> named nand-gpio.ko which is more reasonable.
> 
> We put "nand" first instead of "gpio" because the order is
> usually <subsystem>-<driver>.c, cf ls drivers/gpio/

Do you mind if we take the "english" version which would rather be
"gpio-nand-controller.c/o"? I _really_ want people to understand we
don't emulate the storage but the host part here.

Thanks,
Miquèl