linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 23/24] selftests/resctrl: Add L2 CAT test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b9f7c227-7d64-453e-8ec6-6c20ad3881c7@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Nov 2023 08:31:46 -0800
From:   Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To:     Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>,
        Maciej Wieczór-Retman 
        <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/24] selftests/resctrl: Add L2 CAT test

Hi Ilpo,

On 11/7/2023 1:33 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> man perf_event_open() says this:
> 
> "If type is PERF_TYPE_RAW, then a custom "raw" config  value  is  needed.
> Most  CPUs  support  events  that  are  not covered by the "generalized"
> events.  These are implementation defined; see your CPU manual (for  ex-
> ample  the  Intel Volume 3B documentation or the AMD BIOS and Kernel De-
> veloper Guide).  The libpfm4 library can be used to translate  from  the
> name in the architectural manuals to the raw hex value perf_event_open()
> expects in this field."
> 
> ...I've not come across libpfm myself either but to me it looks libpfm 
> bridges between those architecture specific tables and perf_event_open(). 
> That is, it could provide the binary value necessary in constructing the 
> perf_event_attr struct.
> 
> I think this is probably the function which maps string -> 
> perf_event_attr:
> 
> https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/pfm_get_os_event_encoding.3.html
> 

This sounds promising. If this works out I think that it would be ideal if
the L2 CAT test is not blocked by absence of libpfm. That is, the resctrl
tests should not fail to build if libpfm is not present but instead
L2 CAT just turns into a simple functional test. To accomplish this it looks
like tools/build/Makefile.feature can be helpful and already has a check
for libpfm.

Reinette