[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231108165717.GM3818@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 17:57:17 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...tannapisa.it>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vineeth Pillai <vineeth@...byteword.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] sched/deadline: Deferrable dl server
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 04:14:18PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > + if (dl_se->zerolax && dl_se->runtime > dl_runtime)
> > + dl_se->runtime = dl_runtime;
> > +
>
> Anyway, I have the impression that this breaks EDF/CBS, as we are letting
> the dl_server run with full dl_runtime w/o postponing the period
> (essentially an u = 1 reservation until runtime is depleted).
Yeah, I sorted it with Daniel, we were not trying to fix the same
problem :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists