[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9af8a19c3398e7dc09cfc1fbafed98d795d9f83e.1699464622.git.baruch@tkos.co.il>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 19:30:22 +0200
From: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Ramon Fried <ramon@...reality.ai>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
Subject: [PATCH RFC] arm64: DMA zone above 4GB
My platform RAM starts at 32GB. It has no RAM under 4GB. zone_sizes_init()
puts the entire RAM in the DMA zone as follows:
[ 0.000000] Zone ranges:
[ 0.000000] DMA [mem 0x0000000800000000-0x00000008bfffffff]
[ 0.000000] DMA32 empty
[ 0.000000] Normal empty
Consider a bus with this 'dma-ranges' property:
#address-cells = <2>;
#size-cells = <2>;
dma-ranges = <0x00000000 0xc0000000 0x00000008 0x00000000 0x0 0x40000000>;
Devices under this bus can see 1GB of DMA range between 3GB-4GB. This
range is mapped to CPU memory at 32GB-33GB.
Current zone_sizes_init() code considers 'dma-ranges' only when it maps
to RAM under 4GB, because zone_dma_bits is limited to 32. In this case
'dma-ranges' is ignored in practice, since DMA/DMA32 zones are both
assumed to be located under 4GB. The result is that the stmmac driver
DMA buffers allocation GFP_DMA32 flag has no effect. As a result DMA
buffer allocations fail.
The patch below is a crude workaround hack. It makes the DMA zone
cover the 1GB memory area that is visible to stmmac DMA as follows:
[ 0.000000] Zone ranges:
[ 0.000000] DMA [mem 0x0000000800000000-0x000000083fffffff]
[ 0.000000] DMA32 empty
[ 0.000000] Normal [mem 0x0000000840000000-0x0000000bffffffff]
...
[ 0.000000] software IO TLB: mapped [mem 0x000000083bfff000-0x000000083ffff000] (64MB)
With this hack the stmmac driver works on my platform with no
modification.
Clearly this can't be the right solutions. zone_dma_bits is now wrong for
one. It probably breaks other code as well.
Is there any better suggestion to make DMA buffer allocations work on
this hardware?
Thanks
---
arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 74c1db8ce271..5fe826ac3a5f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -136,13 +136,13 @@ static void __init zone_sizes_init(void)
unsigned long max_zone_pfns[MAX_NR_ZONES] = {0};
unsigned int __maybe_unused acpi_zone_dma_bits;
unsigned int __maybe_unused dt_zone_dma_bits;
- phys_addr_t __maybe_unused dma32_phys_limit = max_zone_phys(32);
+ phys_addr_t __maybe_unused dma32_phys_limit = DMA_BIT_MASK(32) + 1;
#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
acpi_zone_dma_bits = fls64(acpi_iort_dma_get_max_cpu_address());
dt_zone_dma_bits = fls64(of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(NULL));
zone_dma_bits = min3(32U, dt_zone_dma_bits, acpi_zone_dma_bits);
- arm64_dma_phys_limit = max_zone_phys(zone_dma_bits);
+ arm64_dma_phys_limit = of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(NULL) + 1;
max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA] = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma_phys_limit);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
--
2.42.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists