[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231109185439.1535962-5-visitorckw@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 02:54:36 +0800
From: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
To: bleung@...omium.org, tzungbi@...nel.org
Cc: groeck@...omium.org, chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] platform/chrome: Fix typo 'lantency' in comment
Replace 'lantency' with 'latency' in the comment.
Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
---
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c
index 85764e62cbe4..92faf701b8f0 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static s64 cros_ec_sensor_ring_median(s64 *array, size_t length)
* While a and b are recorded at accurate times (due to the EC real time
* nature); c is pretty untrustworthy, even though it's recorded the
* first thing in ec_irq_handler(). There is a very good change we'll get
- * added lantency due to:
+ * added latency due to:
* other irqs
* ddrfreq
* cpuidle
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists