linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs: RESOLVE_CACHED final path component fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHpGcMJfNNRDAvGhH-1Fs79uTks10XhLXBLeCqABoxufZeLGzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Nov 2023 23:12:32 +0100
From:   Andreas Grünbacher <andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Abhi Das <adas@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: RESOLVE_CACHED final path component fix

Am Do., 9. Nov. 2023 um 23:00 Uhr schrieb Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 08:08:44PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > Jens,
> >
> > since your commit 99668f618062, applications can request cached lookups
> > with the RESOLVE_CACHED openat2() flag.  When adding support for that in
> > gfs2, we found that this causes the ->permission inode operation to be
> > called with the MAY_NOT_BLOCK flag set for directories along the path,
> > which is good, but the ->permission check on the final path component is
> > missing that flag.  The filesystem will then sleep when it needs to read
> > in the ACL, for example.
> >
> > This doesn't look like the intended RESOLVE_CACHED behavior.
> >
> > The file permission checks in path_openat() happen as follows:
> >
> > (1) link_path_walk() -> may_lookup() -> inode_permission() is called for
> > each but the final path component. If the LOOKUP_RCU nameidata flag is
> > set, may_lookup() passes the MAY_NOT_BLOCK flag on to
> > inode_permission(), which passes it on to the permission inode
> > operation.
> >
> > (2) do_open() -> may_open() -> inode_permission() is called for the
> > final path component. The MAY_* flags passed to inode_permission() are
> > computed by build_open_flags(), outside of do_open(), and passed down
> > from there. The MAY_NOT_BLOCK flag doesn't get set.
> >
> > I think we can fix this in build_open_flags(), by setting the
> > MAY_NOT_BLOCK flag when a RESOLVE_CACHED lookup is requested, right
> > where RESOLVE_CACHED is mapped to LOOKUP_CACHED as well.
>
> No.  This will expose ->permission() instances to previously impossible
> cases of MAY_NOT_BLOCK lookups, and we already have enough trouble
> in that area.

True, lockdep wouldn't be happy.

>  See RCU pathwalk patches I posted last cycle;

Do you have a pointer? Thanks.

> I'm
> planning to rebase what still needs to be rebased and feed the
> fixes into mainline, but that won't happen until the end of this
> week *AND* ->permission()-related part of code audit will need
> to be repeated and extended.
>
> Until then - no, with the side of fuck, no.
>