lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4df68c74c4da46ac943ac21578e9b084@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Nov 2023 22:55:38 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>
Subject: Build fail in drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c

I'm seeing a build fail at line 1878 of intel_tc.c

gcc is being a bit over-enthusiastic about snprintf() formats
and reports that "%c/TC#%d", xxx, tc_port + 1 might not fit
in the 8 bytes available.
'tc_port' is an enum with values -1 to 5.
I guess it is either allowing for the full 'int' value of
the enum.
Changing to '(tc_port & 7) + 1' stops the compiler bleating.

The code isn't new, so I guess the compiler flags have changed?

It might depend on the gcc version as well.
I'm using gcc 7.5.0 from Ubuntu 18.04.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ