linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net] net: microchip: lan743x : bidirectional throughuput improvement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231109150402.12fda9cf@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:04:02 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     <VishvambarPanth.S@...rochip.com>
Cc:     <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <Bryan.Whitehead@...rochip.com>,
        <andrew@...n.ch>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: microchip: lan743x : bidirectional throughuput
 improvement

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 10:53:26 +0000 VishvambarPanth.S@...rochip.com wrote:
> Thanks for your feedback. I apologize for the delayed response.
> 
> The data presented in the patch description was aimed to convince a
> reviewer with the visible impact of the performance boosts in both x64
> and ARM platforms. However, the main motivation behind the patch was
> not merely a "good-to-have" improvement but a solution to the
> throughput issues reported by multiple customers in several platforms.
> We received lots of customer requests through our ticket site system
> urging us to address the performance issues on multiple kernel versions
> including LTS. While it's acknowledged that stable branch rules
> typically do not consider performance fixes that are not documented in
> public Bugzilla, this performance enhancement is essential to many of
> our customers and their end users and we believe should therefore be
> considered for stable branch on the basis of it’s visible user impact.
> Few issues reported by our customers are mentioned below, even though
> these issues have existed for a long time, the data presented below is
> collected from the customer within last 3 months.
>  
> Customer-A using lan743x with Hisilicon- Kirin 990 processor in 5.10
> kernel, reported a mere ~300Mbps in Rx UDP. The fix significantly
> improved the performance to ~900Mbps Rx  in their platform.
>  
> Customer-B using lan743x with v5.10 has an issue with Tx UDP being only
> 157Mbps in their platform. Including the fix in the patch boosts the
> performance to ~600Mbps in Tx UDP.
>  
> Customer-C using lan743x with ADAS Ref Design in v5.10 reported UDP
> Tx/Rx to be 126/723 Mbps and the fix improved the performance to
> 828/956 Mbps.
>  
> Customer-D using lan743x with Qcom 6490 with v5.4 wanted improvements
> for their platform from UDP Rx 200Mbps. The fix along with few other
> changes helped us to bring Rx perf to 800Mbps in customer’s platform
> 
> This is a kind request for considering the acceptance of this patch
> into the net branch, as it has a significant positive impact on users
> and does not have any adverse effects.

Thanks a lot for the details. Unfortunately after further consideration
I can't accept this patch as a fix with clear conscience. The code has
been this way for a long time, performance improvements should end up
in new kernels and people who want to benefit from faster kernels should
not be sticking to old LTS releases.

So please repost for net-next next week, when it's open again.