lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <134bb70e-db8a-0892-0a3c-d00ad57fcece@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Nov 2023 23:46:25 -0800 (PST)
From:   Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:     Omkar Wagle <ov.wagle@...il.com>
cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, hughd@...gle.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MM: shmem: Remove code sytle warnings

mm not MM, style not sytle.

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023, Omkar Wagle wrote:

> Remove most of the code style warnings
> 
> Signed-off-by: Omkar Wagle<ov.wagle@...il.com>
> ---
>  mm/shmem.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Thanks for trying, but I'm sorry: very little of this is an improvement.

Almost all of it is just adding a blank line in between declaration and
code in some small block (including at least one from Linus himself).

checkpatch does a good job of encouraging tidy patches, but it makes no
claim to being right; and that particular nag annoys me more often than
any other (though I often grudgingly give in to it, just for a quiet life
- Cc'ing Matthew because I suspect he resents it even more than I do).

And look at those fsparams: Al and others have gone to the trouble of
lining them up nicely, but you've decided to undo their work.

I believe it's explained somewhere (but admit that a quick look in
Documentation didn't show me where), that checkpatch is something to run
to tidy up your patches, or new source files (or perhaps even staging);
but please don't send its advice on well-established source files.

Hugh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ