[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9cbfbd59-0761-406d-e97e-75e83bc4e6d0@csgroup.eu>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 07:50:58 +0000
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
"linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>, Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
guoren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org" <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-csky@...r.kernel.org" <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>,
"loongarch@...ts.linux.dev" <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org" <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-sh@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
"sparclinux@...r.kernel.org" <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/22] arch: vdso: consolidate gettime prototypes
Le 08/11/2023 à 20:37, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2023, at 19:31, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> Le 08/11/2023 à 13:58, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
>
>> powerpc has functions doing more or less the same, they are called
>> __c_kernel_clock_gettime() and alike with their prototypes siting in
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h
>>
>> Should those prototypes be moved to include/vdso/gettime.h too and
>> eventually renamed, or are they considered too powerpc specific ?
>
> I don't actually know, my initial interpretation was that
> these function names are part of the user ABI for the vdso,
> but I never looked closely enough at how vdso works to
> be sure what the actual ABI is.
>
> If __c_kernel_clock_gettime() etc are not part of the user-facing
> ABI, I think renaming them for consistency with the other
> architectures would be best.
>
User-facing ABI function is __kernel_clock_gettime(), defined in
arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S , see man vdso.
There is no prototype defined for it anywhere, obviously that's
undetected because it is assembly. Should a prototype be added somewhere
anyway ?
__kernel_clock_gettime() sets up a stack frame, retrieves the address of
the datapage then calls __c_kernel_clock_gettime() which then calls
__cvdso_clock_gettime_data() which is part of the generic CVDSO.
Maybe that's too different from what other architectures do ?
Christophe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists