[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98c5a6ef-3865-9254-0af7-2d041a64d368@salutedevices.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 12:09:34 +0300
From: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>
To: Viacheslav Bocharov <adeep@...ina.in>,
Liang Yang <liang.yang@...ogic.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
CC: <oxffffaa@...il.com>, <kernel@...rdevices.ru>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: rawnand: meson: handle OOB buffer according OOB
layout
Hello, thanks for review!
On 09.11.2023 11:06, Viacheslav Bocharov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 08:39 +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>> In case of MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB mode, MTD/NAND layer fills/reads OOB buffer
>> according current OOB layout so we need to follow it in the driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>> index 561d46d860b7..0d4d358152d7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_set_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
>> __le64 *info;
>> int i, count;
>>
>> - for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
>> + for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
>> info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
>> *info |= oob_buf[count];
>> *info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;
> Seems something wrong with your logic here.
> I think this code should most likely look like this:
>
> for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
> info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> *info |= oob_buf[count];
> if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
> *info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;
> }
For 64 bytes OOB and 512 bytes ECC this driver reports free areas as:
AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
where AA is free byte(user byte), BB - ECC codes. So to access user bytes
we need bytes 0,1,16,17,32,33,48,49. nand->ecc.bytes == 14, so 'count' is
increased at 16 every iteration, so i guess this is correct.
WDYT?
Thanks, Arseniy
>
>
>> @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_get_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
>> __le64 *info;
>> int i, count;
>>
>> - for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
>> + for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
>> info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
>> oob_buf[count] = *info;
>> oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;
> And there:
>
> for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
> info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> oob_buf[count] = *info;
> if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
> oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;
> }
>
>
> This is more similar to the behavior of similar functions in the proprietary U-Boot.
>
> --
> Viacheslav Bocharov
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists