[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29197ec3-e341-4f93-86ef-899bda0d7060@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 10:46:25 +0100
From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...labora.com>
To: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>,
mchehab@...nel.org, tfiga@...omium.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
ming.qian@....com, ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl, nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 18/56] media: dvb-core: Use vb2_get_buffer() instead
of directly access to buffers array
W dniu 31.10.2023 o 17:30, Benjamin Gaignard pisze:
> Use vb2_get_buffer() instead of direct access to the vb2_queue bufs array.
> This allows us to change the type of the bufs in the future.
> After each call to vb2_get_buffer() we need to be sure that we get
> a valid pointer so check the return value of all of them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...labora.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_vb2.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_vb2.c b/drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_vb2.c
> index b322ef179f05..3a966fdf814c 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_vb2.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_vb2.c
> @@ -355,12 +355,13 @@ int dvb_vb2_reqbufs(struct dvb_vb2_ctx *ctx, struct dmx_requestbuffers *req)
> int dvb_vb2_querybuf(struct dvb_vb2_ctx *ctx, struct dmx_buffer *b)
> {
> struct vb2_queue *q = &ctx->vb_q;
> + struct vb2_buffer *vb2 = vb2_get_buffer(q, b->index);
>
> - if (b->index >= q->num_buffers) {
> - dprintk(1, "[%s] buffer index out of range\n", ctx->name);
> + if (!vb2) {
> + dprintk(1, "[%s] invalid buffer index\n", ctx->name);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - vb2_core_querybuf(&ctx->vb_q, q->bufs[b->index], b);
> + vb2_core_querybuf(&ctx->vb_q, vb2, b);
> dprintk(3, "[%s] index=%d\n", ctx->name, b->index);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -385,13 +386,14 @@ int dvb_vb2_expbuf(struct dvb_vb2_ctx *ctx, struct dmx_exportbuffer *exp)
> int dvb_vb2_qbuf(struct dvb_vb2_ctx *ctx, struct dmx_buffer *b)
> {
> struct vb2_queue *q = &ctx->vb_q;
> + struct vb2_buffer *vb2 = vb2_get_buffer(q, b->index);
> int ret;
>
> - if (b->index >= q->num_buffers) {
> - dprintk(1, "[%s] buffer index out of range\n", ctx->name);
> + if (!vb2) {
> + dprintk(1, "[%s] invalid buffer index\n", ctx->name);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - ret = vb2_core_qbuf(&ctx->vb_q, q->bufs[b->index], b, NULL);
> + ret = vb2_core_qbuf(&ctx->vb_q, vb2, b, NULL);
> if (ret) {
> dprintk(1, "[%s] index=%d errno=%d\n", ctx->name,
> b->index, ret);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists