[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <683359b7-bab4-4eef-a047-c3dc1a04f9d6@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 11:18:48 +0100
From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...labora.com>
To: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>,
mchehab@...nel.org, tfiga@...omium.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
ming.qian@....com, ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl, nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
kernel@...labora.com, Matt Ranostay <matt.ranostay@...sulko.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 26/56] media: i2c: video-i2c: Stop direct calls to
queue num_buffers field
Hi Benjamin,
W dniu 31.10.2023 o 17:30, Benjamin Gaignard pisze:
> Use vb2_get_num_buffers() to avoid using queue num_buffers field directly.
> This allows us to change how the number of buffers is computed in the
> future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>
> CC: Matt Ranostay <matt.ranostay@...sulko.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/video-i2c.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/video-i2c.c b/drivers/media/i2c/video-i2c.c
> index 178bd06cc2ed..ebf2ac98a068 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/video-i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/video-i2c.c
> @@ -405,9 +405,10 @@ static int queue_setup(struct vb2_queue *vq,
> {
> struct video_i2c_data *data = vb2_get_drv_priv(vq);
> unsigned int size = data->chip->buffer_size;
> + unsigned int q_num_bufs = vb2_get_num_buffers(vq);
>
> - if (vq->num_buffers + *nbuffers < 2)
> - *nbuffers = 2;
> + if (q_num_bufs + *nbuffers < 2)
> + *nbuffers = 2 - q_num_bufs;
This actually changes the logic. Maybe it has already been discussed and
the result of that discussion is this change in logic? Looking at other
drivers *nbuffers = 2 - q_num_bufs; seems the right thing to do.
But then at least the commit message body IMO should mention this change.
Or, preferably, the change in logic should be a separate patch to be applied
before this one.
Regards,
Andrzej
>
> if (*nplanes)
> return sizes[0] < size ? -EINVAL : 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists