[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZUy0mj1frKoTebgX@tiehlicka>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 11:29:46 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@...cinc.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
david@...hat.com, vbabka@...e.cz, hannes@...xchg.org,
quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] mm: page_alloc: unreserve highatomic page blocks
before oom
On Sun 05-11-23 18:20:48, Charan Teja Kalla wrote:
> __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim() is called from slowpath allocation where
> high atomic reserves can be unreserved after there is a progress in
> reclaim and yet no suitable page is found. Later should_reclaim_retry()
> gets called from slow path allocation to decide if the reclaim needs to
> be retried before OOM kill path is taken.
>
> should_reclaim_retry() checks the available(reclaimable + free pages)
> memory against the min wmark levels of a zone and returns:
> a) true, if it is above the min wmark so that slow path allocation will
> do the reclaim retries.
> b) false, thus slowpath allocation takes oom kill path.
>
> should_reclaim_retry() can also unreserves the high atomic reserves
> **but only after all the reclaim retries are exhausted.**
>
> In a case where there are almost none reclaimable memory and free pages
> contains mostly the high atomic reserves but allocation context can't
> use these high atomic reserves, makes the available memory below min
> wmark levels hence false is returned from should_reclaim_retry() leading
> the allocation request to take OOM kill path. This can turn into a early
> oom kill if high atomic reserves are holding lot of free memory and
> unreserving of them is not attempted.
>
> (early)OOM is encountered on a VM with the below state:
> [ 295.998653] Normal free:7728kB boost:0kB min:804kB low:1004kB
> high:1204kB reserved_highatomic:8192KB active_anon:4kB inactive_anon:0kB
> active_file:24kB inactive_file:24kB unevictable:1220kB writepending:0kB
> present:70732kB managed:49224kB mlocked:0kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:688kB
> local_pcp:492kB free_cma:0kB
> [ 295.998656] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 32
> [ 295.998659] Normal: 508*4kB (UMEH) 241*8kB (UMEH) 143*16kB (UMEH)
> 33*32kB (UH) 7*64kB (UH) 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB
> 0*4096kB = 7752kB
>
> Per above log, the free memory of ~7MB exist in the high atomic
> reserves is not freed up before falling back to oom kill path.
>
> Fix it by trying to unreserve the high atomic reserves in
> should_reclaim_retry() before __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim() can
> fallback to oom kill path.
>
> Fixes: 0aaa29a56e4f ("mm, page_alloc: reserve pageblocks for high-order atomic allocations on demand")
> Reported-by: Chris Goldsworthy <quic_cgoldswo@...cinc.com>
> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@...cinc.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Thanks!
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 95546f3..e07a38f 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -3809,14 +3809,9 @@ should_reclaim_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned order,
> else
> (*no_progress_loops)++;
>
> - /*
> - * Make sure we converge to OOM if we cannot make any progress
> - * several times in the row.
> - */
> - if (*no_progress_loops > MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES) {
> - /* Before OOM, exhaust highatomic_reserve */
> - return unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(ac, true);
> - }
> + if (*no_progress_loops > MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES)
> + goto out;
> +
>
> /*
> * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead
> @@ -3859,6 +3854,11 @@ should_reclaim_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned order,
> schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
> else
> cond_resched();
> +out:
> + /* Before OOM, exhaust highatomic_reserve */
> + if (!ret)
> + return unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(ac, true);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists