linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 02/12] net: page_pool: create hooks for custom page providers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fdf6b2e9c5a734b1a03336f7d5bcfd06bdef47c5.camel@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 09 Nov 2023 12:09:37 +0100
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To:     Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@...gle.com>,
        Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 02/12] net: page_pool: create hooks for custom
 page providers

On Sun, 2023-11-05 at 18:44 -0800, Mina Almasry wrote:
> diff --git a/include/net/page_pool/types.h b/include/net/page_pool/types.h
> index 6fc5134095ed..d4bea053bb7e 100644
> --- a/include/net/page_pool/types.h
> +++ b/include/net/page_pool/types.h
> @@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ struct page_pool_params {
>  	int		nid;
>  	struct device	*dev;
>  	struct napi_struct *napi;
> +	u8		memory_provider;
> +	void            *mp_priv;

Minor nit: swapping the above 2 fields should make the struct smaller.

>  	enum dma_data_direction dma_dir;
>  	unsigned int	max_len;
>  	unsigned int	offset;
> @@ -118,6 +120,19 @@ struct page_pool_stats {
>  };
>  #endif
>  
> +struct mem_provider;
> +
> +enum pp_memory_provider_type {
> +	__PP_MP_NONE, /* Use system allocator directly */
> +};
> +
> +struct pp_memory_provider_ops {
> +	int (*init)(struct page_pool *pool);
> +	void (*destroy)(struct page_pool *pool);
> +	struct page *(*alloc_pages)(struct page_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp);
> +	bool (*release_page)(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page);
> +};
> +
>  struct page_pool {
>  	struct page_pool_params p;
>  
> @@ -165,6 +180,9 @@ struct page_pool {
>  	 */
>  	struct ptr_ring ring;
>  
> +	const struct pp_memory_provider_ops *mp_ops;
> +	void *mp_priv;

Why the mp_ops are not part of page_pool_params? why mp_priv is
duplicated here?

Cheers,

Paolo