[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231109120126.75vxgrcdjusfr54y@skbuf>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 14:01:26 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Faizal Rahim <faizal.abdul.rahim@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 4/7] net/sched: taprio: get corrected value of
cycle_time and interval
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 06:20:20AM -0500, Faizal Rahim wrote:
> @@ -215,6 +216,31 @@ static void switch_schedules(struct taprio_sched *q,
> *admin = NULL;
> }
>
> +static bool cycle_corr_active(s64 cycle_time_correction)
> +{
> + if (cycle_time_correction == INIT_CYCLE_TIME_CORRECTION)
> + return false;
> + else
> + return true;
> +}
> @@ -259,14 +286,6 @@ static int duration_to_length(struct taprio_sched *q, u64 duration)
> return div_u64(duration * PSEC_PER_NSEC, atomic64_read(&q->picos_per_byte));
> }
>
> -static bool cycle_corr_active(s64 cycle_time_correction)
> -{
> - if (cycle_time_correction == INIT_CYCLE_TIME_CORRECTION)
> - return false;
> - else
> - return true;
> -}
> -
Don't move code around that you've introduced in earlier changes. Just
place it where it needs to be from the beginning.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists