[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <039518cc-379c-4800-b034-21ad8fbbc51a@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 13:28:14 +0100
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] KVM: s390: cpu model: Use proper define for
facility mask size
On 11/8/23 18:12, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> Use the previously unused S390_ARCH_FAC_MASK_SIZE_U64 instead of
> S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_U64 for defining the fac_mask array.
> Note that both values are the same, there is no functional change.
>
> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists