[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231108181318.5360af18@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 18:13:18 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: longli@...uxonhyperv.com
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] hv_netvsc: Mark VF as slave before exposing
it to user-mode
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:56:52 -0800 longli@...uxonhyperv.com wrote:
> From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
>
> When a VF is being exposed form the kernel, it should be marked as "slave"
> before exposing to the user-mode. The VF is not usable without netvsc running
> as master. The user-mode should never see a VF without the "slave" flag.
>
> An example of a user-mode program depending on this flag is cloud-init
> (https://github.com/canonical/cloud-init/blob/19.3/cloudinit/net/__init__.py)
Quick grep for "flags", "priv" and "slave" doesn't show anything.
Can you point me to the line of code?
> When scanning interfaces, it checks on if this interface has a master to
> decide if it should be configured. There are other user-mode programs perform
> similar checks.
>
> This commit moves the code of setting the slave flag to the time before VF is
> exposed to user-mode.
> Change since v3:
> Change target to net-next.
You don't consider this a fix? It seems like a race condition.
> - if (ether_addr_equal(vf_netdev->perm_addr, ndev->perm_addr)) {
> - netdev_notice(vf_netdev,
> - "falling back to mac addr based matching\n");
> + if (ether_addr_equal(vf_netdev->perm_addr, ndev->perm_addr) ||
> + ether_addr_equal(vf_netdev->dev_addr, ndev->perm_addr))
This change doesn't seem to be described in the commit message.
Please note that we have a rule against reposting patches within 24h:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#resending-after-review
Powered by blists - more mailing lists