linux-kernel - Re: [Question]: major faults are still triggered after mlockall when numa balancing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231109141141.GC8683@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:11:41 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     "zhangpeng (AS)" <zhangpeng362@...wei.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        lstoakes@...il.com, hughd@...gle.com, david@...hat.com,
        fengwei.yin@...el.com, vbabka@...e.cz, mgorman@...e.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com, ying.huang@...el.com,
        hannes@...xchg.org, Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@...wei.com>,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [Question]: major faults are still triggered after mlockall when
 numa balancing

On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 09:47:24PM +0800, zhangpeng (AS) wrote:
> Is there any way to avoid such a major fault?

man madvise