linux-kernel - [PATCH 29/41] afs: Dispatch vlserver probes in priority order

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231109154004.3317227-30-dhowells@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu,  9 Nov 2023 15:39:52 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>
Cc:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 29/41] afs: Dispatch vlserver probes in priority order

When probing all the addresses for a volume location server, dispatch them
in order of descending priority to try and get back highest priority one
first.

Also add a tracepoint to show the transmission and completion of the
probes.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>
cc: linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
---
 fs/afs/internal.h          |  1 +
 fs/afs/vl_list.c           |  2 ++
 fs/afs/vl_probe.c          | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
 include/trace/events/afs.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/afs/internal.h b/fs/afs/internal.h
index 90b82e50da18..b88589bb4a6e 100644
--- a/fs/afs/internal.h
+++ b/fs/afs/internal.h
@@ -447,6 +447,7 @@ struct afs_vlserver {
 	rwlock_t		lock;		/* Lock on addresses */
 	refcount_t		ref;
 	unsigned int		rtt;		/* Server's current RTT in uS */
+	unsigned int		debug_id;
 
 	/* Probe state */
 	wait_queue_head_t	probe_wq;
diff --git a/fs/afs/vl_list.c b/fs/afs/vl_list.c
index 5c4cd71caccf..9b1c20daac53 100644
--- a/fs/afs/vl_list.c
+++ b/fs/afs/vl_list.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ struct afs_vlserver *afs_alloc_vlserver(const char *name, size_t name_len,
 					unsigned short port)
 {
 	struct afs_vlserver *vlserver;
+	static atomic_t debug_ids;
 
 	vlserver = kzalloc(struct_size(vlserver, name, name_len + 1),
 			   GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -21,6 +22,7 @@ struct afs_vlserver *afs_alloc_vlserver(const char *name, size_t name_len,
 		rwlock_init(&vlserver->lock);
 		init_waitqueue_head(&vlserver->probe_wq);
 		spin_lock_init(&vlserver->probe_lock);
+		vlserver->debug_id = atomic_inc_return(&debug_ids);
 		vlserver->rtt = UINT_MAX;
 		vlserver->name_len = name_len;
 		vlserver->service_id = VL_SERVICE;
diff --git a/fs/afs/vl_probe.c b/fs/afs/vl_probe.c
index f868ae5d40e5..b128dc3d8af7 100644
--- a/fs/afs/vl_probe.c
+++ b/fs/afs/vl_probe.c
@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ void afs_vlserver_probe_result(struct afs_call *call)
 out:
 	spin_unlock(&server->probe_lock);
 
+	trace_afs_vl_probe(server, false, alist, index, call->error, call->abort_code, rtt_us);
 	_debug("probe [%u][%u] %pISpc rtt=%d ret=%d",
 	       server_index, index, rxrpc_kernel_remote_addr(addr->peer),
 	       rtt_us, ret);
@@ -150,8 +151,10 @@ static bool afs_do_probe_vlserver(struct afs_net *net,
 {
 	struct afs_addr_list *alist;
 	struct afs_call *call;
-	unsigned int index;
+	unsigned long unprobed;
+	unsigned int index, i;
 	bool in_progress = false;
+	int best_prio;
 
 	_enter("%s", server->name);
 
@@ -165,7 +168,20 @@ static bool afs_do_probe_vlserver(struct afs_net *net,
 	memset(&server->probe, 0, sizeof(server->probe));
 	server->probe.rtt = UINT_MAX;
 
-	for (index = 0; index < alist->nr_addrs; index++) {
+	unprobed = (1UL << alist->nr_addrs) - 1;
+	while (unprobed) {
+		best_prio = -1;
+		index = 0;
+		for (i = 0; i < alist->nr_addrs; i++) {
+			if (test_bit(i, &unprobed) &&
+			    alist->addrs[i].prio > best_prio) {
+				index = i;
+				best_prio = alist->addrs[i].prio;
+			}
+		}
+		__clear_bit(index, &unprobed);
+
+		trace_afs_vl_probe(server, true, alist, index, 0, 0, 0);
 		call = afs_vl_get_capabilities(net, alist, index, key, server,
 					       server_index);
 		if (!IS_ERR(call)) {
diff --git a/include/trace/events/afs.h b/include/trace/events/afs.h
index 81eb87fbcfa7..f1815b3dafb0 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/afs.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/afs.h
@@ -1420,6 +1420,40 @@ TRACE_EVENT(afs_fs_probe,
 		      &__entry->srx.transport)
 	    );
 
+TRACE_EVENT(afs_vl_probe,
+	    TP_PROTO(struct afs_vlserver *server, bool tx, struct afs_addr_list *alist,
+		     unsigned int addr_index, int error, s32 abort_code, unsigned int rtt_us),
+
+	    TP_ARGS(server, tx, alist, addr_index, error, abort_code, rtt_us),
+
+	    TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		    __field(unsigned int,		server)
+		    __field(bool,			tx)
+		    __field(unsigned short,		flags)
+		    __field(u16,			addr_index)
+		    __field(short,			error)
+		    __field(s32,			abort_code)
+		    __field(unsigned int,		rtt_us)
+		    __field_struct(struct sockaddr_rxrpc, srx)
+			     ),
+
+	    TP_fast_assign(
+		    __entry->server = server->debug_id;
+		    __entry->tx = tx;
+		    __entry->addr_index = addr_index;
+		    __entry->error = error;
+		    __entry->abort_code = abort_code;
+		    __entry->rtt_us = rtt_us;
+		    memcpy(&__entry->srx, rxrpc_kernel_remote_srx(alist->addrs[addr_index].peer),
+			   sizeof(__entry->srx));
+			   ),
+
+	    TP_printk("vl=%08x %s ax=%u e=%d ac=%d rtt=%d %pISpc",
+		      __entry->server, __entry->tx ? "tx" : "rx", __entry->addr_index,
+		      __entry->error, __entry->abort_code, __entry->rtt_us,
+		      &__entry->srx.transport)
+	    );
+
 #endif /* _TRACE_AFS_H */
 
 /* This part must be outside protection */