[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f027b47-e778-15fc-0306-a5ae094f1070@landley.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 10:42:44 -0600
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] fix rootfstype=tmpfs
On 11/8/23 16:05, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 11/1/23 09:10, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> On 2/21/23 16:04, Rob Landley wrote:
>>> Wire up rootfstype=tmpfs to force rootfs to be tmpfs even when you
>>> specify root=
>>>
>>> Initramfs automatically uses tmpfs (if available) when you DON'T
>>> specify a
>>> root= fallback root to mount over initramfs, but some people can't NOT do
>
> can't NOT -> cannot
The double negative was intentional for emphasis, hence the capitalization. They
are unable to refrain from doing. "Could you just... not do that?" "No, I cannot
not do that."
But if you want to phrase it differently, go ahead.
>>> that for some reason (old bootloaders), so let rootfstype=tmpfs
>>> override it.
>>>
>>> My original code tried to do this 10 years ago but got the test wrong,
>>> and nobody's corrected it since, so here you go...
>
> I think this sentence can be dropped.
If you like.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
>>
>> I would like to be able to have this for some work with OpenBMC and
>> ideally it would propagate to one of the recent kernels with a Fixes tag
>> like this?
>
> Can you repost this patch or should I do it?
They're more likely to listen to you.
Rob
Download attachment "patches.tgz" of type "application/x-compressed-tar" (8137 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists