[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51b3bbff47ff4e8dafeaeff647979d4e@realtek.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 17:29:43 +0000
From: Hau <hau@...ltek.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
CC: nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net v3 1/2] r8169: add handling DASH when DASH is disabled
> > if (!netif_running(tp->dev) || !netif_carrier_ok(tp->dev)) @@
> > -4896,7 +4909,7 @@ static void rtl_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > rtl_rar_set(tp, tp->dev->perm_addr);
> >
> > if (system_state == SYSTEM_POWER_OFF &&
> > - tp->dash_type == RTL_DASH_NONE) {
> > + !tp->dash_enabled) {
>
> Why break the line at all? Now the check fits the 80 char line limit.
I will correct this. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists