linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 0/1] fs: Consider capabilities relative to namespace for linkat permission check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231110170615.2168372-1-cmirabil@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 10 Nov 2023 12:06:14 -0500
From:   Charles Mirabile <cmirabil@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, brauner@...nel.org,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, Charles Mirabile <cmirabil@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/1] fs: Consider capabilities relative to namespace for linkat permission check

This is a one line change that makes `linkat` aware of namespaces when
checking for capabilities.

As far as I can tell, the call to `capable` in this code dates back to
before the `ns_capable` function existed, so I don't think the author
specifically intended to prefer regular `capable` over `ns_capable`,
and no one has noticed or cared to change it yet... until now!

It is already hard enough to use `linkat` to link temporarily files
into the filesystem without the `/proc` workaround, and when moving
a program that was working fine on bare metal into a container,
I got hung up on this additional snag due to the lack of namespace
awareness in `linkat`.

Charles Mirabile (1):
  fs: Consider capabilities relative to namespace for linkat permission
    check

 fs/namei.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

base-commit: 89cdf9d556016a54ff6ddd62324aa5ec790c05cc
-- 
2.38.1