[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a80bfd8-7092-4a85-93a6-189a16725642@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 14:42:31 +0100
From: Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
stefan.bader@...onical.com, tim.gardner@...onical.com,
roxana.nicolescu@...onical.com, cascardo@...onical.com,
kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, wei.liu@...nel.org,
sashal@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Check cc_vendor when printing memory encryption
info
On 10/11/2023 13:46, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 01:27:08PM +0100, Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
>>> Maybe just remove incorrect info and that's it?
>>>
>>
>> I disagree, other users and I find the print very useful to see which coco
>> platform the kernel is running on and which confidential computing features
>> the kernel detected. I'm willing to fix the code to report correct info.
>
> For TDX, we already have "tdx: Guest detected" in dmesg. sme_early_init()
> can do something similar.
>
That doesn't cover TDX guests with TD partitioning on Hyper-V.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists