[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfuBxxXE3ro2_WHM=c7yExcJqc8qY7rFmnT=jUs9_V4rTPugg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 12:21:04 -0700
From: jim.cromie@...il.com
To: Łukasz Bartosik <lb@...ihalf.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>,
Yaniv Tzoreff <yanivt@...gle.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...gle.com>,
Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>,
Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@...il.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
upstream@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/12] trace: use TP_printk_no_nl in dyndbg:prdbg,devdbg
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 7:51 AM Łukasz Bartosik <lb@...ihalf.com> wrote:
>
> wt., 7 lis 2023 o 01:45 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> napisał(a):
> >
> > On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 14:10:05 +0100
> > Łukasz Bartosik <lb@...ihalf.com> wrote:
> >
> > > index ccc5bcb070f9..91dcdbe059c0 100644
> > > --- a/include/trace/events/dyndbg.h
> > > +++ b/include/trace/events/dyndbg.h
> > > @@ -20,20 +20,10 @@ TRACE_EVENT(prdbg,
> > >
> > > TP_fast_assign(
> > > __entry->desc = desc;
> > > - /*
> > > - * Each trace entry is printed in a new line.
> > > - * If the msg finishes with '\n', cut it off
> > > - * to avoid blank lines in the trace.
> > > - */
> > > - if (len > 0 && (text[len - 1] == '\n'))
> > > - len -= 1;
> > > -
> > > memcpy(__get_str(msg), text, len);
> > > - __get_str(msg)[len] = 0;
> > > ),
> > >
> > > - TP_printk("%s.%s %s", __entry->desc->modname,
> > > - __entry->desc->function, __get_str(msg))
> > > + TP_printk_no_nl("%s", __get_str(msg))
> > > );
> > >
> >
> > Instead of adding the TP_printk_no_nl() (Which I still do not like), we
> > could add a:
> >
> > __get_str_strip_nl(msg)
> >
> > That will do the above loop. Which will move the processing to read side
> > (slow path).
> >
> > And then we could update libtraceevent to handle that too.
> >
>
> Thanks Steve.
>
> Jim, if you don't mind I will make the suggested changes ?
>
if Steve likes it, Im happy.
> > -- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists