[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 18:34:56 +0530
From: Krishna Kurapati PSSNV <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
CC: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"Andy Gross" <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
"Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Felipe Balbi" <balbi@...nel.org>,
Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
"Mathias Nyman" <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>, <quic_ppratap@...cinc.com>,
<quic_jackp@...cinc.com>, <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
<quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 02/13] dt-bindings: usb: Add bindings for multiport
properties on DWC3 controller
On 11/11/2023 4:25 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 03:17:40PM +0530, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV wrote:
>> On 11/11/2023 2:00 PM, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV wrote:
>>> On 11/10/2023 6:58 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>
>>>>> phy-names:
>>>>> minItems: 1
>>>>> - maxItems: 2
>>>>> - items:
>>>>> - enum:
>>>>> - - usb2-phy
>>>>> - - usb3-phy
>>>>> + maxItems: 8
>>>>> + oneOf:
>>>>> + - items:
>>>>> + enum: [ usb2-phy, usb3-phy ]
>>>>> + - items:
>>>>> + pattern: "^usb[23]-port[0-3]$"
>>>>
>>>> Shouldn't this just be
>>>>
>>>> pattern: "^usb[23]-[0-3]$"
>>>>
>>>> so that it matches the names that are used by the nvidia bindings?
>>>>
>>>> We already have some inconsistency in that Amlogic uses a variant based
>>>> on the legacy names that needlessly includes "phy" in the names:
>>>>
>>>> const: usb2-phy0
>>>> const: usb2-phy1
>>>> const: usb3-phy0
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> I don't think we should be introducing a third naming scheme here so I
>>>> suggest just following the nvidia bindings.
>
>>>>> In that case, why don't we use "^usb[23]-phy[0-3]$". I think its close
>>> to what we have on dwc3 core already today (usb2-phy/usb3-phy).
>>
>> I mean, it isn't needless. It is a phy and shouldn't the binding suggest
>> that and include "-phy" in the name ?
>
> No, adding a '-phy' suffix to each name is unnecessary since the
> property is called 'phy-names'.
>
> This is also documented:
>
> For names used in {clock,dma,interrupt,reset}-names, do not add
> any suffix, e.g.: "tx" instead of "txirq" (for interrupt).
>
> https://docs.kernel.org/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.html
>
Thanks for the explanation.
> and we've already discussed this when I asked you to drop the likewise
> redundant '_irq' suffix from the interrupt names.
Yes, we did discuss this in irq context. But in this case I thought it
was fine because we already have usb(2/3)-"phy" already present.
When pushing v14, will make this change to usb(2/3)-(0-3) and skip port/phy.
Regards,
Krishna,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists