[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dfaa2d21-6ec2-4c19-b8ed-73328ceab1fb@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 22:49:56 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, x86@...nel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sev: Fix overflow when computing address for
PVALIDATE
On 11/10/23 18:00, Michael Roth wrote:
> - vaddr = (unsigned long)pfn_to_kaddr(e->gfn);
> + vaddr = (unsigned long)pfn_to_kaddr((unsigned long)e->gfn);
> size = e->pagesize ? RMP_PG_SIZE_2M : RMP_PG_SIZE_4K;
> validate = e->operation == SNP_PAGE_STATE_PRIVATE;
>
... and people wonder why some of us avoid bitfields.
Shouldn't we just fix this permanently in pfn_to_kaddr()? Surely more
of these are lurking around. Anything doing a large shift up on a
little type is asking for trouble.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists