linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: pm8001: return error code if no attached dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f576b808-d99a-77f5-a1fc-f1366f6d6f4b@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Nov 2023 14:43:20 +0800
From:   Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>
To:     Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>, <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>,
        <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        <nathan@...nel.org>, <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, <trix@...hat.com>
CC:     <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>, <johannes.thumshirn@....com>,
        <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>, <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: pm8001: return error code if no attached dev

On 2023/11/13 14:32, Su Hui wrote:
> On 2023/11/13 13:56, Jason Yan wrote:
>> Hi, Su
>>
>> On 2023/11/13 13:01, Su Hui wrote:
>>> Clang static analyzer complains that value stored to 'res' is never 
>>> read.
>>> Return the error code when sas_find_attached_phy_id() failed.
>>>
>>> Fixes: ec64858657a8 ("scsi: pm8001: Use sas_find_attached_phy_id() 
>>> instead of open coding it")
>>
>> This 'Fixes' tag is not right. This commit is only a refactor and did 
>> not change the original logic here.
>>
> Hi, Jason
> 
> Thanks for your reply. But I think the logic of this code is changed.

I,m talking about the Fixes tag: ec64858657a8 ("scsi: pm8001: Use 
sas_find_attached_phy_id() instead of open coding it"

That commit did not change the original logic. So your patch is not 
fixing that commit.

> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c | 2 ++
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c 
>>> b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
>>> index a5a31dfa4512..a1f58bfff5c0 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
>>> @@ -662,6 +662,8 @@ static int pm8001_dev_found_notify(struct 
>>> domain_device *dev)
>>>                      SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr),
>>>                      SAS_ADDR(parent_dev->sas_addr));
>>>               res = phy_id;
>>> +            pm8001_free_dev(pm8001_device);
>>> +            goto found_out;
> 
> Before this patch, we won't go to label 'found_out', and will call 
> PM8001_CHIP_DISP->reg_dev_req() ....
> 
> After this patch, we just free the 'pm8001_device' and return the error 
> code.
> 
> Or maybe I misunderstand somewhere?

Sorry, but I'm not talking about your patch.

Thanks,
Jason

> 
> Su Hui
> 
> 
> .