linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ata: pata_pxa: convert not to use dma_request_slave

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZVHYK1rI9Z8DcKJP@x1-carbon>
Date:   Mon, 13 Nov 2023 08:05:42 +0000
From:   Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@....com>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
CC:     Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
        Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: pata_pxa: convert not to use
 dma_request_slave_channel()

Hello Christophe,

On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 04:07:59PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> dma_request_slave_channel() is deprecated. dma_request_chan() should
> be used directly instead.
> 
> Switch to the preferred function and update the error handling accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/pata_pxa.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_pxa.c b/drivers/ata/pata_pxa.c
> index 5275c6464f57..0c9c9cf63d36 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_pxa.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_pxa.c
> @@ -274,9 +274,8 @@ static int pxa_ata_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	/*
>  	 * Request the DMA channel
>  	 */
> -	data->dma_chan =
> -		dma_request_slave_channel(&pdev->dev, "data");
> -	if (!data->dma_chan)
> +	data->dma_chan = dma_request_chan(&pdev->dev, "data");

While the previous API could only return NULL on failure, the new API can
return an actual error.

I think we should return the actual error instead of -EBUSY.

i.e.:

if (IS_ERR(data->dma_chan))
	return PTR_ERR(data->dma_chan);


> +	if (IS_ERR(data->dma_chan))
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  	ret = dmaengine_slave_config(data->dma_chan, &config);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 


Kind regards,
Niklas