lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3f02f00-3422-4c4b-b142-2981441bed96@suse.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Nov 2023 10:40:35 +0200
From:   Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
To:     Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...el.com,
        kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        tony.luck@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...en8.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, rafael@...nel.org, david@...hat.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, len.brown@...el.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        isaku.yamahata@...el.com, ying.huang@...el.com, chao.gao@...el.com,
        sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, bagasdotme@...il.com,
        sagis@...gle.com, imammedo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 00/23] TDX host kernel support



On 9.11.23 г. 13:55 ч., Kai Huang wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> (Again I didn't include the full cover letter here to save people's time.
>   The full coverletter can be found in the v13 [1]).
> 
> This version mainly addressed one issue that we (Intel people) discussed
> internally: to only initialize TDX module 1.5 and later versions.  The
> reason is TDX 1.0 has some incompatibility issues to the TDX 1.5 and
> later version (for detailed information please see [2]).  There's no
> value to support TDX 1.0 when the TDX 1.5 are already out.
> 
> Hi Kirill, Dave (and all),
> 
> Could you help to review the new patch mentioned in the detailed
> changes below (and other minor changes due to rebase to it)?
> 
> Appreciate a lot!
> 

It looks good as a foundation to build on apart from Dave's comment 
about the read out of metadata fields are there any outstanding issues 
impending the merge of this series - Dave?


FWIW:

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ