linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] riscv: dts: cv1800b: add pinctrl node for cv1800b

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <58a99001-8260-4970-9fc7-25fe81e557a5@sifive.com>
Date:   Sun, 12 Nov 2023 20:51:20 -0500
From:   Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>
To:     Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Chao Wei <chao.wei@...hgo.com>,
        Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] riscv: dts: cv1800b: add pinctrl node for cv1800b

On 2023-11-12 6:57 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Add the reset device tree node to cv1800b SoC reusing the
          ^^^^^
          I assume you mean pinctrl here?

> pinctrl-single driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv-pinctrl.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv1800b.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv-pinctrl.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv-pinctrl.h b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv-pinctrl.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ed78b6fb3142
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv-pinctrl.h

A couple of questions: Should this go in include/dt-bindings? And is it worth
including macros for the actual function mappings, like in the vendor source[1]?

[1]:
https://github.com/milkv-duo/duo-buildroot-sdk/blob/develop/linux_5.10/drivers/pinctrl/cvitek/cv180x_pinlist_swconfig.h

> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * This header provides constants for pinctrl bindings for Sophgo CV* SoC.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
> + */
> +#ifndef _DTS_RISCV_SOPHGO_CV_PINCTRL_H
> +#define _DTS_RISCV_SOPHGO_CV_PINCTRL_H
> +
> +#define MUX_M0		0
> +#define MUX_M1		1
> +#define MUX_M2		2
> +#define MUX_M3		3
> +#define MUX_M4		4
> +#define MUX_M5		5
> +#define MUX_M6		6
> +#define MUX_M7		7
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv1800b.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv1800b.dtsi
> index e04df04a91c0..7a44d8e8672b 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv1800b.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv1800b.dtsi
> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
>  #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>  #include <dt-bindings/reset/sophgo,cv1800b-reset.h>
>  
> +#include "cv-pinctrl.h"
> +
>  / {
>  	compatible = "sophgo,cv1800b";
>  	#address-cells = <1>;
> @@ -55,6 +57,14 @@ soc {
>  		dma-noncoherent;
>  		ranges;
>  
> +		pinctrl0: pinctrl@...1000 {
> +			compatible = "pinctrl-single";
> +			reg = <0x3001000 0x130>;
> +			#pinctrl-cells = <1>;
> +			pinctrl-single,register-width = <32>;
> +			pinctrl-single,function-mask = <0x00000007>;
> +		};

>From the vendor driver[2], it looks like this peripheral block only handles
pinmuxing, so indeed this looks like a good use of pinctrl-single.

[2]:
https://github.com/milkv-duo/duo-buildroot-sdk/blob/develop/linux_5.10/drivers/pinctrl/cvitek/pinctrl-cv180x.h

> +
>  		rst: reset-controller@...3000 {
>  			compatible = "sophgo,cv1800b-reset";
>  			reg = <0x03003000 0x1000>;